Marx og Engels i det grønne. Statuer af Karl Marx og Friedrich Engels i Bishkek, Kirghizstan. Taget 9. august 2017. © Zorion, CC-BY-SA, Wikimedia Commons
Marx og Engels i det grønne. Statuer af Karl Marx og Friedrich Engels i Bishkek, Kirghizstan. Taget 9. august 2017. © Zorion, CC-BY-SA, Wikimedia Commons

Emneliste om Karl Marx’ og Friedrich Engels’ forhold til miljø og økologi. I en række indlæg diskuterer marxister her betydningen af, hvad de skrev og tilbageviser beskyldningen om at de ikke beskæftigede sig med miljøet og dets betydning.


Indhold

o1SaveEarthDestroyCapitalism3-2.jpg

Se også på Socialistiske Bibliotek:


 

På dansk (og norsk/svensk)

Socialistisk Information
  • Svend Vestergaard Jensen: Om Marx, naturen og miljøet (nr.233, marts 2010, s.32-37)
    “Mange tror, at den klassiske marxisme repræsenterer en uhæmmet vækstbegejstring uden gnist af økologisk forståelse. Det er faktisk helt forkert, forklarer Svend Vestergaard Jensen i disse noter om marxismen og forholdet til naturgrundlaget. “
  • John Bellamy Foster: Det Kommunistiske Manifest: et anti-økologisk kampskrift? (nr.118, april 1998, s.28-29)
    “Eller grundlaget for en forståelse af menneskets vekselvirkning med naturen.”

01marxmiljo.jpg

Solidaritet
  • John Bellamy Foster: Marx og den globale miljøkrise (nr.1, februar 2008)
    “Det er almindeligt at betragte marxismen som en miljøfjendtlig filosofi. Men i virkeligheden var Marx og Engels pionerer inden for den økologiske tænkning, forklarer tidsskriftet Monthly Reviews redaktør John Bellamy Foster i denne artikel.” Artiklen er også bragt i Socialistisk Arbejderavis (nr.280, 3. juli 2008)
  • Terie Valen: Marxisme og økologi (nr.1, marts 2001). Anmeldelse af John Bellamy Fosters bog Marx’ Ecology: Materialism and Nature (Monthly Review Press, 2000). Artiklen er p.t. ikke online.
Gnist/Rødt: Marxistisk Tidsskrift
  • Kapital og natur. Eit intervju med Paul Burkett av Joao Aguiar (nr.2, 2008)
    “I strid med mange tolkingar studerte og inkluderte Marx ei økologisk analyse i Kapitalen.”
Tidssignal

Michael Löwy: Från Marx och Engels till ekosocialism (pdf) (nr.11, 2010, online på Marxistarkiv.se)
“Marxismens pionjärer var inte alls omedvetna om miljöfrågor – tvärtom! Även om de givetvis inte kunde förutse alla problem.”


 

På engelsk

Against the Current
  • Michael Löwy: Marx’s Ecology: recovered legacy (No.194, May-June 2018)
    “While mainstream ecological theory has been dismissive of Karl Marx, serious research in recent decades has recovered some of his very important insights on ecological issues.”
  • Michael Livingston: Marx on the planet (No.113, November-December 2004 ). Review of John Bellamy Foster, Marx’s Ecology: Materialism and Nature (Monthly Review Press, 2000)
  • John Bellamy Foster: Nature and the Communist Manifesto (No.72, January-February 1998)
    “Most contemporary commentators on Marx and Engels and the environment have been highly critical of the founders of historical materialism.”
American Journal of Sociology
  • John Bellamy Foster: Marx’s theory of metabolic rift: Classical foundations for environmental sociology (pdf) (Vol.105, No.2, September 1999, p.366-405; online at Johnbellamyfoster.org)
    “This article addresses a paradox: on the one hand, environmental sociology, as currently developed, is closely associated with the thesis that the classical sociological tradition is devoid of systematic insights into environmental problems; on the other hand, evidence of crucial classical contributions in this area, particularly in Marx, but also in Weber, Durkheim, and others, is too abundant to be convincingly denied.”
Black Pepper Books

Marx & Ecology
(Calicut, Black Pepper Books, December 2013, 119 p.)
Collection of essays by John Bellamy Foster, p.5-65 (Monthly Review 2013 + 2011) + Michael Malkin, p.66-119 (Weekly Worker, 2000)

Climate & Capitalism
  • Essential books on Marxism and Ecology. By Ian Angus (November 10, 2017)
    “The following list does not pretend to be complete. I could easily double or triple the number of titles without covering the field, but I’ve tried to keep it to a manageable length. With one exception, all were published in the past 20 years.”
Ecologist

The emergence of an ecological Karl Marx: 1818-2018 (5 May 2018)
“Here, Gareth Dale, an editor of the book Green Growth, examines Marx’s own claims about nature and society – and our original interpretation of them.”

Freedom Socialist
  • Marx and Engels on ecology (Vol.26, No.6, December 2005-January 2006)
    “The slander that Marxism has little to say about the environment persists. In reality, Karl Marx and Frederick Engels addressed these concerns in nearly everything they wrote … What follows is only a small selection of their writing on the subject.”
International Handbook of Environmental Sociology

Edited by Michael Redclift and Graham Woodgate (Edward Elgar, 2010, p.106-120; online at Johnbellamyfoster.org)

International Socialism
  • John Bellamy Foster: Marx’s ecology in historical perspective (Issue 96, Autumn 2002, p.71-86)
    “JB Foster draws on his excellent recent book, Marx’s Ecology, in order to give a devasting reply to those who argue that Marx and the Marxist tradition have had little to say on environmental and ecological issues.” See also review of JB Foster’s book in Socialist Review (Issue 244, September 2000)
International Socialist Review
  • Elizabeth Terzakis: Marx and nature: Why we need Marx now more than ever  (Issue 109, Summer 2018)
    “The bottom line is that Marx offers an explanation of and a solution to ecological crisis: capitalism prefigures ecological doom and must be abolished.”
  • Chris Williams: Marxism and ecology (Issue 105, Summer 2017, p.158-161)
    Review of John Bellamy Foster and Paul Burkett, Marx and the Earth: An Anti-critique (Haymarket Books, 2017, 316 p.)
    “[The book] offers a fascinating portrait of Marx and Engel’s thinking on ecological Marxism, successfully refutes the criticism made by recent ecosocialist detractors …” See also review by Elaine Graham-Leigh: Marx the ecologist (Counterfire, March 8, 2018).
Karl Marx’s Grundrisse

Edited by Marcelo Musto (Routledge, 2008, p.93-106; online at Johnbellamyfoster.org)

  • John Bellamy Foster: Marx’s Grundrisse and the ecological contradictions of capitalism (pdf)
    “Recent research has revealed that an ecological–materialist critique was
    embedded in all of Marx’s work … The Grundrisse has therefore become an indispensable means of unifying Marx’s overall analysis. It not only stands chronologically between his early writings and Capital, but also constitutes a conceptual bridge between the two.”
Marx & Philosophy Review of Book
  • Steve Knight: Karl Marx’s Ecosocialism (19 January 2018)
    Review of Kohei Saito, Karl Marx’s Ecosocialism: Capital, Nature, and the Unfinished Critique of Political Economy (Monthly Review Press, 2017, 308 p.). “Kohei Saito provides an intellectually rigorous, yet accessible, guide for readers not only as to why healing capital’s ecological rifts was essential to Marx’s socialist project, but also how Marx’s decades-long reading project in the natural sciences …” See also review by Elaine Graham-Leigh: Marx the ecologist (Counterfire, March 8, 2018) + Hannah Holleman: Marx’s essential contribution to ecosocialism (International Socialist Review, Issue 108, Spring 2018) + Martin Empson: Marx’s ecological education (Monthly Review, Vol.69, No.11, April 2018).
Monthly Review
  • Subject: Marxist Ecology
  • John Bellamy Foster and Brett Clark: The robbery of nature: Capitalism and the Metabolic Rift (Vol.70, No.3, Summer 2018)
    “Marx’s notion of ‘the robbery of the soil’ is intrinsically connected to the rift in the metabolism between human beings and the earth.”
  • John Bellamy Foster: Marx, value, and nature (Vol.70, No.3, Summer 2018)
    “In recent years ecological critiques of capitalism have deepened and multiplied, resulting in new debates over the conception, scope, and purpose of Marx’s value theory and its relation to the natural world.”
  • John Bellamy Foster and Brett Clark: Marx’s Ecology and the Left (Vol.68, No.2, June 2016)
    “… the notion of Marx’s anti-ecological perspective became deeply rooted in Western Marxism … Surveying this history, we will examine the debates on Marxian ecology that have emerged within the left …”
  • Kohei Saito: Marx’s Ecological Notebooks (Vol.67, No.9, February 2016)
    “Looking at the notebooks after 1868, one can immediately recognize the rapid expansion of Marx’s ecological interests.”
  • John Bellamy Foster: Paul Burkett’s Marx and Nature fifteen years after (Vol.66, No.7, December 2014)
    “Foreword to the second edition of Paul Burkett, Marx and Nature: A Red and Green Perspective (Haymarket, 2014, 309 p.)
  • Kohei Saito: The emergence of Marx’s critique of modern agriculture: Ecological insights from his Excerpt Notebooks (Vol.66, No.5, October 2014)
    “Examining Marx’s excerpts cautiously, one realizes that he first attained a truly critical and ecological comprehension of modern agriculture, that goes beyond the paradigm of the Ricardian theory of differential rent, in the middle of the 1860s.”
  • John Bellamy Foster: The ecology of Marxian political economy (Vol.63, No.4, September 2011)
    “In the following analysis, therefore, I will discuss not only the ecological critique provided by Marx (and Engels), but also that of later Marxian and radical political economists …”
  • Paul Burkett: Marx’s vision of sustainable human development (Vol.57, No.5, October 2005)
    “The suggestion that Marx’s communism can inform the struggle for more healthy, sustainable, and liberating forms of human development may seem paradoxical in light of various ecological criticisms of Marx that have become so fashionable over the last several decades.”
  • John Bellamy Foster: Marx’s ecological value analysis (Vol.52, No.4, September 2000). Review of Paul Burkett, Marx and Nature: A Red and Green Perspective (MacMillan, 1999)
  • John Bellamy Foster: Marx and the environment (Vol.47, No.3, July-August, 1995). Only abstract online.
    “It has become fashionable in recent years, in the words of one critic, to identify the growth of ecological consciousness with ‘the current postmodernist interrogation of the metanarrative of the Enlightenment’ … Nowhere is this fashion more evident than in certain criticisms directed at Marx and Engels.”
MR Online
  • John Bellamy Foster: Marx and the global environmental rift (28/11/07)
    “Ecology is often seen as a recent invention. But the idea that capitalism degrades the environment in a way that disproportionately affects the poor and the colonized was already expressed in the nineteenth century in the work of Karl Marx and Frederick Engels.”
  • Capital and Nature: An interview with Paul Burkett (24/04/07)
    “Contrary to many interpretations, Marx studied and included an ecological analysis in Capital.”
Organization & Environment
  • Paul Burkett and John Bellamy Foster: Classical Marxism and the second law of thermodynamics: Marx/Engels, the heat death of the universe theory, and the origins of ecological economics (pdf) (Vol.21, No.1, March 2008, p.1-35; online at Johnbellamyfoster.org)
    “This opens the way to the recognition that Marx’s political economy was unique
    in the 19th century in incorporating thermodynamics into the core of its analysis, thus providing the foundations for an ecological economics.”
  • Brett Clark and John Bellamy Foster: The environmental conditions of the working class (pdf) (Vol.19, No.3, September 2006, p.375-88; online at Johnbellamyfoster.org). An introduction to selections from Frederick Engels’s The Condition of the Working Class in England in 1844.
    “For Engels [the book] was to be the first of a series of connected analyses of ecology that stretched through more than half a century … making him one of the most important but underappreciated contributors to the development of environmental thought.”
  • John Bellamy Foster: The crisis of the earth: Marx’s theory of ecological sustainability as a nature-imposed necessity for human production (pdf) (Vol.10, No.3, September 1997, p.280-297; online at Johnbellamyfoster.org)
    “The literature on Marx and the environment is voluminous, reflecting the wide range of disagreement, the theoretical complexity of the issues involved, and – above all – the high stakes associated with the the ecological evaluation of Marx’s thought.”
Socialist Register
  • John Bellamy Foster: The Communist Manifesto and the environment (Merlin Press/Monthly Review Press, 1998, p.169-189)
    “To what extent is the Manifesto – arguably the most influential political pamphlet of all time – compatible with ecological values, as we understand them today? Moreover, how is the Manifesto to be situated within the rest of Marx and Engels’ thought in this respect?”
Socialist Worker
  • John Bellamy Foster: Marx and ecology (Issue 2080, 8 December 2007)
    “Karl Marx’s analysis of the environment under capitalism shows how saving the planet is inextricably linked to transforming our society.”
Synthesis/Regeneration
  • Book review by Tom Smith (Issue 23, Fall 2000):
    James [i.e. John] Bellamy Foster: Marx’s Ecology (New York, Monthly Review Press, 2000)
    Paul Burkett: Marx and Nature (New York, St. Martin’s Press, 1999)
    “Many ‘populist’ writers still condemn Marx for his alleged ‘Promethean’ faith in technological progress. Many ‘Marxists’ agree – and accept the charge proudly. For them, workers’ control will merely ensure that even heretofore-dangerous technologies-nuclear power, for example – will become safe. Even such ‘social ecologists’ as Murray Bookchin accept this view of Marx’s concept of ecology and progress. Foster’s and Burkett’s books thoroughly debunk this belief.”
Theory and Society
  • Paul Burkett and John Bellamy Foster: Metabolism, energy, and entropy in Marx’s critique of political economy: Beyond the Podolinsky myth (pdf) (Vol.35, No.1, February 2006, p.109-56; online at Johnbellamyfoster.org)
    “Building on an earlier analysis of Marx’s and Engels’s response to Podolinsky, this article shows that they relied on an open-system, metabolic-energetic model
    that adhered to all of the main strictures of ecological economics – but one that
    also (unlike ecological economics) rooted the violation of solar and other
    environmental-sustainability conditions in the class relations of capitalist society.”
Weekly Worker
  • Marx and ecology, Part 1 (Issue 349, August 31, 2000) + Part 2 (Issue 350, September 7, 2000) + Part 3 (Issue 352, September 21, 2000)
    “Michael Malkin examines the relationship between humanity and nature in the thought of Karl Marx.”
World Review of Political Economy
  • Brett Clark and John Bellamy Foster: Marx’s ecology in the 21st century (pdf) (Vol.1, No.1, March 2010, p.142-56; online at Johnbellamyfoster.org)
    “Thus Marx’s ecology in the eyes of some green left and even ecosocialist thinkers is largely irrelevant to 21st-century conditions … Our argument is radically different. We contend that Marx’s materialist and metabolic approach … provide an invaluable methodological foundation to critique contemporary environmental degradation and to envision social and ecological transformation.”

01marxmiljoberling.jpg


 

Se også:

A Reading Guide: Ecology & Marxism, by Andreas Malm (Historical Materialism, 2017).

Fred Magdoff: Problemet er kapitalisme (Kritisk Debat, 16. februar 2015)
“Dette oplæg blev holdt den 20. september 2014 på ’New York City Climate Convergence’ – et stort alternativt topmøde for klimaaktivister arrangeret af bevægelsen ’System Change Not Climate Change’ og ’Global Climate Convergence’.

Kriget om energiframtiden (Röda Rummet, nr.2-3, 2013)
“John Bellamy Foster kommenterar och analyserar kampen kring vår tids stora energidilemma.” Også online på Marxistarkiv.se (pdf).

Socialismens økologi (Arbejderen.dk, 22. januar 2011)
“Det belgiske ugemagasin Solidaire, bragte i april sidste år dette interview, hvor den amerikanske marxist John Bellamy Foster giver nye argumenter i kampen for en socialistisk økologi.”

En økologisk-social revolution (Solidaritet, nr.4, december 2009, s.14-22; online på Lars Henrik Carskov Blog)
“Nutidens økologiske krise udspringer af kapitalens voldsomme ekspansion ind på alle livets områder. En økologisk omstilling indebærer derfor også et opgør med det kapitalistiske system af global irrationalitet. Det skriver John Bellamy Foster i dette uddrag fra sin seneste bog The Ecological Revolution: Making Peace with the Planet (2009, kap. 13, s.253-264).”

Simon Butler: Økologi og socialisme – to uadskillelige revolutioner (Socialistisk Information, 02.09.09). Anmeldelse af John Bellamy Foster: The Ecological Revolution: Making Peace with the Planet (2009).

John Bellamy Foster: Økologi og overgangen fra kapitalisme til socialisme (Det Ny Clarté, nr.10, maj 2009). (Pdf – s. 42-49)
“Socialismen har siden sin oprindelse været optaget af økologisk bæredygtighed. Den er insisterende i sin kritiske analyse af markedets vækstfilosofi og dets fremmedgørelse fra naturen.”

John Bellamy Foster: Peak oil – om topp i oljeproduksjonen og energiimperialisme (Rødt! nr.2, 2009)
“Framveksten av open militarisme og imperialisme ved starten på det tjueførste hundreåret har stort sett si årsak i forsøk frå dei dominerande kreftene i verdsøkonomien på å vinne kontroll over dei minkande oljeforsyningane i verda.”

John Bellamy Foster: Ødeleggelsens økologi (Rødt! nr.2a, 2007)
“Jeg vil starte denne analysen av det jeg kaller ‘ødeleggelsens økologi’ med å referere til Gillo Pontecorvos film Brenn / Queimada fra 1969.”

EFTERLAD ET SVAR

Indtast din kommentar
Indtast dit navn her

Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment may take some time to appear.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.