Photo by Anton Rusetsky on Unsplash. Sun Clouds at Sunset in Минск, Minsk, Belarus
Photo by Anton Rusetsky on Unsplash. Sun Clouds at Sunset in Минск, Minsk, Belarus

bear_121_137.jpg
Klimaskeptikerne dækker over en blandet (og uenig) skare, i Danmark med seriøse forskere som astrofysikeren Henrik Svensmark (Wikipedia.dk), o1SaveEarthDestroyCapitalism3-2.jpgignoranter som Folketingets formand Thor Pedersen (Berlingske, 4.12.09) og bevægelsen omkring Venstre, Cepos og Dansk Folkeparti (Information, 21.9.09) og deres Alternative Klimakonference (Information, 9.12.09), til forskere, som er betalte agenter for olie-og kulindustrien. Klimaskeptikerne står stærkest i den borgerlige lejr, men findes også på venstrefløjen (se fx debatten i In Defence of Marxism og ZNet nedenfor).

Indhold


 

På dansk

Berlingske.dk

Global opvarmning frosset ihjel. Af Lars Henrik Aagaard (12. februar 2010)
“Klimaskeptikere har kronede dage. Først kom ‘Climategate’, så kom det hule resultat af COP15 i et snedækket København, så kom afsløringen af en indlysende fejl i FN-klimapanelet IPCCs seneste rapport, og endelig satte den vedvarende kulde og sne den definitive trumf på.”

Ud af videnskabet: Arkiv for kategorien ‘klimaskeptikere’.
Lars Henrik Aagaards blog.

Forskerforum

Klimabekymrede kontra skeptikerne (pdf) (nr.228, oktober 2009, s.1)
“Klimaforskere kastebold i spil mellem politikere, medier og
meningsfløje op til klima-topmødet i december.”

Tema: Klimaforskning: Kamp om mediernes opmærksomhed – Klimaforskning som politisk kampplads – Jyllands-Posten:
Mikrofonholder for klimaskeptikere (s.8-11). Scroll ned.

Information.dk

Emne: Klimaskeptikerne

Klimaskeptikere er få og fagligt letpåklædte. Af Jørgen Steen Nielsen (22. juni 2010)
“De får ikke skrevet eller godkendt mange videnskabelige artikler, og der er ikke mange i forskermiljøet, der finder det berettiget at citere dem, viser ny undersøgelse af de forskere, der fortsat bestrider, at klimaændringerne er menneskeskabte.”

Tvivlens købmænd kommer til kort. Af Jørgen Steen Nielsen (20. juni 2010). Interview med videnskabshistorikeren Naomi Oreskes, som har skrevet en ny bog om alliancen mellem industriinteresser og konservative videnskabsmænd.

Klimakrig: En skæbnesvanger sejr for klimaskeptikerne. Af Jørgen Steen Nielsen (26. marts 2010)
“Meningsmålingerne synes at være med klimaskeptikerne i de store engelsksprogede lande. Folk har mistet tilliden til forskerne og er kommet i tvivl om klimatruslen. Men jo hidsigere skeptikerne bliver i deres angreb på videnskaben, desto hurtigere vil deres demagogiske kampagne brænde ud.”

‘Vi tog fejl, og vi har ret’. Af Jørgen Steen Nielsen (12. februar 2010)
“Klimaforskere i klemme. Klimaskeptikere triumferer og afblæser den menneskeskabte opvarmning efter dobbeltfejl i forskerverdenen. Desværre holder klimaforskernes budskab stadig: Planeten er truet.”

Modkraft.dk

Klimabenægtere på krigsstien. Af Finn Kjeller (27. september 2013)
“FN’s nye klimarapport forsøges miskrediteret af velfinansierede ‘skeptikere’. Olieselskaber spytter i kassen for at skabe tvivl og udskyde klimatiltag.”

Skeptica.dk

Er drivhuseffekten nu borte med sneen? Af Mogens Winther (28. december 2009)
“Trods lokale danske snestorme viser den globale temperatur viser sig at være en af de varmeste nogensinde målt.”

Videnskab.dk

Tvisten om klimaet (19. maj 2008)
“De globale middeltemperaturer synes de seneste år at stagnere eller ligefrem at falde. Rokker det ved den almindelige opfattelse, at vores klode er ramt af en langsigtet global opvarmning? Eigil Kaas og Ole Humlum er stærkt uenige.”

Wikipedia.no

Global oppvarming
Klimaskepsis

climate_deniers_620_271.jpg

Klima-fornægtere


 

In English

AlterNet

How the mountain of climate change evidence is being used to undermine the cause. By Bill McKibben (February 27, 2010)
“As the backlash against climate science grows, the number of Americans who believe humans are to blame for warming the planet is shrinking.

How to answer the dumb things climate deniers say. By Joshua Frank (February 9, 2010)
“Below are a few responses to some of the more frequent statements these deniers toss our way.”

BBC

Climate scepticism: The top 10 (12 November 2007)
“What are some of the reasons why ‘climate sceptics’ dispute the evidence that human activities such as industrial emissions of greenhouse gases and deforestation are bringing potentially dangerous changes to the Earth’s climate?”

Center for Public Integrity

Investigation: The Climate Change Lobby (August 2009)
“The report provides a first-of-its-kind look at the universe of special interests shaping the climate change debate in the United States and how it has sharply expanded between 2003 – when Congress previously voted on climate change – and 2008.”

Corporate Europe Observatory

Climate Crashers
“Exposing corporate lobbying and propaganda that undermine effective EU climate policy.”

The Guardian

Climate wars: Guardian special investigation, Part 1-12. By Fred Pearce (9 February 2010)
“In a major investigation, the leading science writer Fred Pearce uncovers the real story behind the hacked emails.”

In Defence of Marxism

Discussion document: Global Warming: A socialist perspective, Part 1. By Brian J. Baker (28 April 2008)
“We start today a serialised article on Global Warming, written by one of our readers who challenges the scientific basis upon which the theory of human-caused climate change is based.” See links at the bottom of the article to Part 2-4.

Emil Reed replies to Brian J. Baker on climate change (9 May 2008)
“Brain J. Baker has given an extremely misleading picture of the state of knowledge about climate change.”

Global-warming deniers and climate change ideologues, Part 1: Basic questions. By Mauro Vanetti (23 May 2008)
“Baker ridicules the concept of ‘scientific consensus’. It is true that the scientific community does not operate in a vacuum and that it is very often subject to pressures of politics, religion, social rules, prejudices and also directly from the market. But this does not invalidate the concept of scientific consensus altogether.” See links at the bottom of the article to Part 2-5.

International Socialism

Why we should be sceptical of climate sceptics. By Suzanne Jeffery (Issue 129, Winter 2011, p.171-182)
“The climate sceptics have a political agenda rather than a scientific one. They want to defeat the argument that global warming requires action, regulation and legislation.”

MET Office

Countering climate controversy
“Climate science finds itself under the spotlight as never before … what are the known facts of climate change; why do scientists talk about uncertainty, and what really happens during the IPCC review process?”

Monthly Review

The scientific case for modern anthropogenic global warming. By John W. Farley (Vol.60, No.3, July-August 2008, p.68-90)
“Arguments against the radical journalist Alexander Cockburn, who forcefully proclaimed anthropogenic global warming to be a myth.”

MR Zine

‘Conspiracy’ science: Mass media and the conservative backlash on global warming. By Anthony DiMaggio (10.03.2010)
“Global warming graduated in the last few years to the status of one of the great enduring political issues of our time. Unfortunately, public discourse is taking a dramatic step backward in light of corporate media’s attacks on the scientific community.”

Natural Environment Researh Council (NERC)

NERC Climate change challenge: Summary of the debate
“A panel of climate change experts answered questions about the science of climate change and discussed a range of scientific theories that try to explain the recent global warming … The web discussion forum has provided the opportunity for sceptics of the science of human-induced climate change to be frank about their views.”

New Scientist

Climate change: A guide for the perplexed (16 May 2007)
“For those who are not sure what to believe, here is our round-up of the most common climate myths and misconceptions.”
See also: Climate myths: Assessing the evidence (16 May 2007)

RealClimate

Index: Responses to common contrarian arguments

The Royal Society

Facts and fictions about climate change (3 September 2009)
“It has become fashionable in some parts of the UK media to portray the scientific evidence that has been collected about climate change and the impact of greenhouse gas emissions from human activities as an exaggeration.”

Climate change controversies: a simple guide (30 June 2007)
“The Society responds here to eight key arguments that are currently in circulation by setting out, in simple terms, where the weight of scientific evidence lies.”

Scientific American

Seven answers to climate contrarian nonsense. By John Rennie (November 30, 2009)
“Evidence for human interference with Earth’s climate continues to accumulate.”

Skeptical Science
“This website gets skeptical about global warming skepticism. Do their arguments have any scientific basis? What does the peer reviewed scientific literature say?”

The Skeptic’s Dictionary

Climate change deniers
“Climate change deniers are contrarians who challenge the evidence that human activities such as deforestation and human behaviors that result in more greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide are causing changes in our planet’s climate that may prove devastating and irreversible.” With links to sites and news stories.

SourceWatch

Global warming skeptics
“Global warming skeptics – also referred to as ‘climate change skeptics’ or ‘anthropogenic (human-induced) global warming skeptics’ – generally refers to individuals or groups who disagree with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports.”

Union of Concerned Scientists

Issues: Global warming contrarians
Contents: Attacks on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change obscure real science – Debunking misinformation about stolen climate emails in the ‘Climategate’ manufactured controversy – New book ‘SuperFreakonomics’ mischaracterizes climate science – Global Warming skeptic organizations – Crichton thriller ‘State of Fear’ – UCS examines ‘The Skeptical Environmentalist’.

Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Global warming controversy
Climate change denial
Business action on climate change
Energy Lobby
Public opinion on climate change

ZNet

Global warming & climate change (2007)
“Alexander Cockburn wrote a piece critical of global warming theorists. ZNet asked George Monbiot to respond. Here is their exchange + Others respond.”


Se også på Socialistisk Bibliotek:


EFTERLAD ET SVAR

Indtast din kommentar
Indtast dit navn her

Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment may take some time to appear.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.